garyhooser ([info]garyhooser) wrote,
@ 2007-09-02 11:38:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:environmental impact statement, hawaii superferry, hooser, senator

SuperFiasco: It did not have to be this way
By State Sen. Gary L. Hooser and published in local newspapers

The Hawaii Superferry Fiasco: It did not have to be this way

The Lingle administration's refusal to acknowledge the egregious errors of the Department of Transportation in its handling of the Hawaii Superferry matter is troubling. The Hawai'i Supreme Court has ruled unequivocally that the DOT erred and that state-approved environmental impact studies should have been required and must be conducted.

The response of the administration and Superferry management in actually accelerating the Hawaii Superferry operations schedule has been appalling. It was in-your-face arrogance that utterly ignores the court's decision and clear mandate.

The message from the fifth floor of the State Capitol to Hawai'i residents is clear: The interest of a single big business takes precedence over the interests of the environment, the law and the people.

Rather than recognize and acknowledge the DOT's mistake and seek a collaborative way to resolve the issue, and rather than taking a leadership role or at least a brief time-out to gather the various parties together in search of an acceptable solution to the complex dilemma they have created, Gov. Linda Lingle, the DOT and the Hawaii Superferry are choosing to once again ignore the law in their zeal to ram the project through the process, regardless of public, environmental or legal concerns.

The law is clear, and the Hawai'i Supreme Court has verified this fact. When public funds are used and the resulting impacts are potentially significant, an official and comprehensive environmental assessment is required.

For the past two years, thousands of our residents, primarily from the Neighbor Islands, have made this claim and requested that the DOT and the Hawaii Superferry comply with the law.

A wide variety of community and environmental organizations have initiated lawsuits calling for a formal environmental review.

County councils on the Big Island, Maui and Kaua'i have passed official resolutions making the same request. The state-sponsored Environmental Council of the Office of Environmental Quality Control issued a formal message stating that an official environmental review should have been required.

A majority of Neighbor Island senators introduced legislation in the recent session and the Senate passed out a bill offering a compromise that would have required an environmental impact statement while allowing for the commencement of operations for the Superferry.

Instead of accepting a win-win solution that would have served both the Superferry and Hawai'i's fragile environment, the DOT and the Hawaii Superferry have steadfastly refused all requests and all offers of compromise, choosing instead the arrogance of the steamroller approach. After all, they had been able to block all attempts by the Legislature, they had the full support of the governor, and the benefit of hundreds of millions of dollars invested by a politically powerful and influential board of directors.

In the end, we live in a nation of laws, and it is refreshing to be reminded that the rule of law prevails.

The Hawai'i Supreme Court, the highest court in our state and an independent third branch of our government, reviewed the arguments presented by both sides and came to the unanimous conclusion that the DOT was wrong and an officially sanctioned environmental review is required.

It did not have to be this way. If the Lingle administration had from the beginning put the interests of the public, the law and the environment ahead of the interests of the Hawaii Superferry, we would not be having this discussion.

In all likelihood, by now the environmental assessment would have been completed and the business operating, albeit with environmental mitigating factors in place.

Instead, because of the administration's mismanagement, we had an escalating and potentially dangerous conflict brewing at our harbors, and today we have a community even more cynical and less trustful of our government, a business whose future is in doubt and the potential of many millions of dollars in lawsuits ahead for the state.

State Sen. Gary L. Hooser, D-7th District (Kaua'i, Ni'ihau), is Senate majority leader.




(Post a new comment)

No Shock
(Anonymous)
2007-09-02 09:47 pm UTC (link)
Expecting a Republican administration to do anything to disrupt the affairs of big business is par for the course.

But you are majority leader of the other party; the party of Mike Gabbard. Your team is just a guilty as LL in terms of quashing the rule of law here. Own up to it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: No Shock
(Anonymous)
2007-09-03 07:26 pm UTC (link)
The Lingle administration is generally "republican" in philosophy. One curious exception to this however, is the administration's support of the Beverage Container Deposit (aka the "Bottle Bill") program in the Department of Health, Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch. Republicans are against "big" government - so why did the administration support the creation of this new program, increasing the size of government with the addition of new personnel, albeit being funded by the beverage container deposit fee? Republicans are supposed against tax increases - so why did the adminstration support a "tax" on beverage containers to fund this stupid program?

I think the answer lies in Lingle's former Administrative Director, Robert Awana, formerly employed by Waste Management and with ties to Reynolds Recycling. Ms. Genevieve Salmonson, former Director of Environmental Quality Control, was formerly employed by Mr. Awana in a previous life and bridged the ethical chasm between State government and the private sector to lobby for the passage of this increase in the size of government and the increase in taxes (disguised as a fee).

The Legislature needs to investigate this pilau situation. Republican? Yeah - only when it lines the pockets of big business. And to prove that the Republicans are "Grand Ole Perverts" here in Hawaii Nei, we have the unresolved fiasco of Bob Awana and Julie Mae.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Third Party Investigation into Superferry's Environmental Pass
(Anonymous)
2007-09-03 10:50 am UTC (link)
The House of Representatives needs to open an investigation with subpoena power into what transpired in the executive branch that lead to the exemption of the Superferry from an environmental assessment. If the investigation indicates misconduct on the part of the Governor then the House needs to prepare articles of impeachment against the Governor. The DOT and OEQC allowing an exemption to go forward for the Superferry is simply PILAU. Those found to have violated State laws should be terminated immediately.

(Reply to this)

permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-09-03 11:06 am UTC (link)
Aloha Gary,

Great article in the G.I today. It still puzzles me why the Cruise ships and YBB don’t need to have an EIS done, but the Super Ferry does. Whether or not the docks were funded by State or Federal monies, an EIS should be required for all companies that use Kauai’s docks on a regular basis. An EIS is for the protection of the island, right? According to Lingle, she’s just saying it should be fair, meaning everyone should abide by the same law; which leads me into the real reason I’m writing you – everyone abiding by the same law.

There is an unfinished eye-sore of a building sitting on state or county land (I’m not sure which) that was fast racked by Kusaka just before she left office. It’s the Kaiola Canoe Club House. From my understanding, it’s been there for over 4 years, still unfinished. Rumors say that it’s illegal in that it violates building codes for height, location (to close to a Heiau and the ocean), and that the permits do not resemble the (partially) finished product. If I were a land owner and wanted to build that structure where it is now and how it is now, I wouldn’t have a chance in hell. Protests, fines, etc.. would stop me. So, how can an organization, non-profit or otherwise get away with building this? Are there favors being done or been done? I’m just writing as a concerned and curious citizen. If it's legal and I'm wrong then I'll be the first to admit it. I'd like to know your take on this situation. Btw, wasn’t it Kaiola Canoe Club that sent their canoes out to block the Super Ferry in protest of not following the law?

Mike


(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-09-03 12:12 pm UTC (link)
In the EIS law (Chapter 343, HRS), in order for an environmental assessment to be required from a private applicant, two things are necessary. First, the action proposed by the private applicant must fall in one of nine categories in Section 343-5, HRS. Secondly, the private applicant must be seeking an approval for the action from an agency (of the state/county executive branch of government).

In the case of barges such as Young Brothers, yes, they are using State land (which meets the first condition above. However, they are not seeking an approval since they have been operating before the EIS law was enacted in 1974 (i.e., they are "grandfathered" in). The same argument can be applied to the airlines and the boats.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-09-04 08:08 am UTC (link)
which is of course, crap. Where once there were about 50 port calls island wide per year, we now have 3 ships full time and others wandering in and out. The 3 full time ships make about 20 ports calls/week. The impact went up by 2 orders of magnitude. If the ferry is a problem, these behemoths are twice as much impact.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-09-04 09:07 am UTC (link)
If the law is "crap" as you refer to it, then lobby your representative to change it. But before doing so, I would recommend that you read up on it, so that you know what to change.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-09-04 09:29 am UTC (link)
why bother. My representative is off chasing rainbows involving hundreds of hydrogen powered ships coming to Hawaii to fuel up. (without a clue about how far out of the way we are or how much sunshine falls on Southern CA where the ships are going anyway or the environmental impact). Meanwhile, my Senator stands by silently while his party takes in Mike Gabbard with open arms and a big celebration. a pox on the whole pack of them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-10-15 04:17 am UTC (link)
Great Idea. I will email representative Morita about introducing a law requiring Young Brothers, Matson and the Airlines to do an EIS. After all, we are talking about our enviroment. This is what it's all about, right? The only thing is they would have to cease operations.
Maybe that's why no law has been passed requiring them to do so.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: permits & procedures
(Anonymous)
2007-10-15 04:26 am UTC (link)
Any comments Senator Hooser?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Hawaii superferry debacle
(Anonymous)
2007-10-06 02:19 am UTC (link)
I wholeheartedly agree with Sen. Hooser's opinion. The U.S.D.O.T. issued the Hawaii Superferry a special permit on March 20, 2007, and this alone constitutes a Federal action and deems that this action must comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the National environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In other words a Section 7 consultation on listed species must be done (on humpback whales, monk seals, sea turtles) and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose the potential impacts to humans and the environment, include public comment, and include possible mitigation measures to minimize or avoid impacts! Sounds so reasonable (and legal!) and as Gary wrote it would not stop the project but would disclose unavoidable impacts and include measures to minimize or avoid others. Garibaldi and all the rest who pushed this through should be held responsible and frankly should be ashamed of themselves,

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…